(We interrupt this series to bring you this small point.)
Why is this meme so right on target?
The whole system is structured around imposing, not exposing. I'm all
for exposing, but exposure to algebra without context just doesn't
produce all that many lovers, or even appreciators, of algebra, any more
than you can really love a hammer before you know that it hits a nail
that holds boards together.
Also, a system organized around "just in case" or "it's for your own
good" learning finds that the sheer quantity of things kids "may need to
know someday" pushes out the things that kids might really want to know
right now, to such a degree that by high school so many kids look at
learning as an annoying chore, something that is being done to them.
Let's not forget that we don't have that "expose" system right now, we
don't give kids a taste of algebra, we give them a whole damn year of
it. Learning that is forced pushes out the ideas that can be developed
into real meaningful learning...and that will most definitely include
algebra, as soon as a kid figures out that it is a key to what he or she
wants to do.
What we lose with this approach is more tragic than what we lose if we stop teaching kids stuff they might need someday.
Bravo, finally a new take on this issue...imposing vs. exposing...
ReplyDelete